[Basil Bunting’s] reading (meaning here his perusal of books) was not uncommonly wide, it was even more uncommonly exact and readily recalled. Always intense and personal his response to any writing was determined by the pleasure and interest it afford him. The absence of this factor makes the academic study of literature a hollow sham, its presence a test of character and truthfulness. Bunting’s taste was formed early: he had a lot to discover but little to unlearn. His revaluation of the canon was more radical than Pound’s and less erratic.
—Kenneth Cox, “Basil Bunting,” The Art of Language: Selected Essays by Kenneth Cox (Flood Editions, 2016), edited and introduced by Jenny Penberthy.
Showing posts with label basil bunting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label basil bunting. Show all posts
8.09.2016
little to unlearn
Labels:
academic,
basil bunting,
canon,
exact,
interest,
kenneth cox,
pleasure,
reading,
taste,
test,
truthfulness
7.11.2016
work in stone
The mason stirs:
Words!
Pens are too light.
Take a chisel to write.
—Basil Bunting, “Briggflatts,” The Poems of Basil Bunting (Faber & Faber, 2016), edited by Don Share.
Words!
Pens are too light.
Take a chisel to write.
—Basil Bunting, “Briggflatts,” The Poems of Basil Bunting (Faber & Faber, 2016), edited by Don Share.
7.06.2007
singularity
Whether you listen to a piece of music, or a poem, or look at a picture on a jug, or a piece of sculpture, what matters about it is not what it has in common with others of its kind, but what is singularly its own.
—Basil Bunting, The Codex
—Basil Bunting, The Codex
Labels:
basil bunting,
common,
music,
picture,
quote,
sculpture,
singularity
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)