Showing posts with label formal poetry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label formal poetry. Show all posts
5.08.2026
not true
Too much of formal poetry is not true to the individual or to the world—
it’s only true to its form.
Labels:
form,
formal poetry,
individual,
true,
world
12.16.2025
design + build
Another way to think of poetic form: Not as a template passed down through time, but something designed and built by the language of a particular poem.
Labels:
build,
design,
form,
formal poetry,
poetic forms
7.29.2025
curse of verse
Formal poems that put perfection of form above poetic essence, fail as poems.
Labels:
fail,
formal poetry,
poetic essence,
prosody
5.20.2022
comes with the territory
It’s rare to find a formal poem that doesn’t sound stilted in places.
Labels:
formal poetry,
rare,
stilted
3.20.2016
comic turn
After modernism, formal poetry became a special case of light verse.
Labels:
formal poetry,
formalism,
light verse,
modernism
1.19.2016
line too far
A fifteenth line was called for, so it wasn’t a sonnet after all.
Labels:
fifteenth line,
form,
formal poetry,
sonnet
10.27.2015
numbers game
Sonneteers are numerologists convinced of the magical power of fourteen.
Labels:
formal poetry,
fourteen,
magic,
numerologist,
sonnet
6.07.2015
freedom in form
There is such a complete freedom now-a-days in respect to technique that I am rather inclined to disregard form so long as I am free and can express myself freely. I don't know of anything, respecting form, that makes much difference. The essential thing in form is to be free in whatever form is used. A free form does not assure freedom. As a form, it is just one more form. So that it comes to this, I suppose, that I believe in freedom regardless of form.
—Wallace Stevens, "A Note on Poetry," Opus Posthumous (Knopf, 1957).
—Wallace Stevens, "A Note on Poetry," Opus Posthumous (Knopf, 1957).
Labels:
form,
formal poetry,
freedom,
wallace stevens
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)