Showing posts with label literary magazines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label literary magazines. Show all posts
7.31.2016
nature abhors a vacuum
Fortunately, the advent of the world wide web was able to absorb the increased output spurred by the creative writing MFA explosion.
6.13.2016
job description
That former art once referred to as editing is now known by the term ‘content management’.
9.08.2012
big thing in a small place
A big exuberant review in a small obscure journal.
Labels:
journal,
literary magazines,
praise,
review,
reviewing
6.27.2012
they found you
Oh good, Simon Perchik and Lyn Lifshin have submitted work to your new journal. You’re really on the map now.
Labels:
literary magazines,
litmags,
overpublishing,
submission
10.24.2011
inadvertent advert
So often listed in poets' bios, more poets knew the name of the literary magazine than ever read the magazine itself.
8.23.2011
11.28.2007
appreciated rejection
Years ago, when I was actively submitting poems to little magazines, I got one of those rare rejection notes that are more than rejection slips, they are small critical essays about one’s poem, elucidating this or that strength &/or failure of the poem at hand. Whether or not one agrees with the comments, one has to appreciate the lavish attention given to one’s poem by the rejecting editor. This is especially true if one has ever edited a small magazine. The sheer volume of submissions that one has to open, wade through, and reject, makes it nearly impossible for an editor (often another poet) to take such time and care with any one submission, no matter how attractive or intriguing or very close to acceptance the particular poem or group of poems may be. In the end, this type of rejection, where the poem is addressed so scrupulously and thoroughly, is a greater gift than if the poem had been accepted with the typically short note: “We’d like to take “X” for the next issue. Thanks for sending us your fine work…” The poem is then published in what is ultimately an obscure place in the pages of the little magazine. One gets a publishing credit; but little more is gained from the experience.
Tonight, I got to hear my rejecter, David Wojahn, read his poems. Speaking to him after his reading, I recounted my experience with his overly generous rejection note. He smiled and said it must have been when he was editing Crazyhorse. I hadn’t even remembered the name of the journal. It wasn’t important. Only the rejection note was.
Tonight, I got to hear my rejecter, David Wojahn, read his poems. Speaking to him after his reading, I recounted my experience with his overly generous rejection note. He smiled and said it must have been when he was editing Crazyhorse. I hadn’t even remembered the name of the journal. It wasn’t important. Only the rejection note was.
10.23.2007
free associative reading
If literary magazines didn’t make payment with copies, who'd ever read them?
Labels:
copies,
free,
literary magazines,
read
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)