Showing posts with label materiality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label materiality. Show all posts

6.26.2016

5.21.2015

rough edge

The right margin of line endings competing with the deckle edge of the page.

12.12.2014

word is

Unlike in prose, the poem will never turn its back on what the word is in terms of sight and sound.

12.03.2013

larger interests

As just sounds and marks I wouldn’t care a whit for words.

5.18.2010

less a thing

Poetry, whose material is language, is perhaps the most human and least worldly of the arts, the one in which the end product remains closest to the thought that inspired it...Of all things of thought, poetry is the closest to thought, and a poem is less a thing than any other work of art.

—Hannah Arendt (1906-1975), The Human Condition (1958)

3.19.2010

stick figures

There was no one behind the poem and no real people in the poem…thus the words reverted to groups of letters that began to look like so many stick figures.

2.10.2008

lump poems

Poems are lumps—physical entities. This does not mean, of course, that they are not about something—the complete dependence of all the paths, the threads, time-space, History, the Social. And the more unrestrainedly the poet gives himself up to the materiality, the more precisely these lumps give off the quality of his conscious effort, of his opinions and ideas. Which is far more interesting than the opinions and ideas themselves—only physical submission shows how long the succession is, demonstrates their real drama.

—Per Kirkeby, “Painterly Poetry,” Selected Essays from Bravura (Van Abbemuseum, 1982), tranlated by Peter Shield.

9.29.2007

effigy of alphabetic straw

To read materially is to make the word a crude effigy of alphabetic straw.

5.01.2007

meaning over matter and sound

The materiality of text is slight. The acoustic effects of language are dismal compared to those of music. Thus, no one is much interested in words devoid of their meanings.