There may be indefinite ranges of symbolic references behind the simplest Japanese poem….If one did not know the mythology he could, from participation in the poem, invent an equivalent one. This is an objective-subjective, fact-and-symbol relationship which is perhaps the defining characteristic of all great poetry. In Japanese verse it stands alone: not an aspect or factor of the poem, but the poem itself.
—Kenneth Rexroth, “Classic Japanese Poetry,” Classics Revisited (New Directions, 1965) [p. 96]
Showing posts with label symbol. Show all posts
Showing posts with label symbol. Show all posts
3.26.2023
8.23.2021
5.14.2018
not common literary property
I get so pissed-off at the plain-talk people—who claim that
Whitman wrote street talk and that William Carlos Williams let it all hang
out—that I forget the beautiful art
of simplicity. When I read a stretch of short, simple, powerful things by Jack
Gilbert, I remember how utterly moving plainness can be: “Divorce”:
Woke up suddenly thinking I heard crying.
Rushed through the dark house.
Woke up suddenly thinking I heard crying.
Rushed through the dark house.
Stopped, remembering. Stood looking
out at the bright moonlight on
concrete.
Everything is there: exact adequacy, intelligence that
withholds comment, and the luck (or vision) of the natural symbol. There is
also that invaluable thing—with luck you hit on it fives times in fifty years
of writing—when you say something that everyone has experienced (waking up
feeling, not knowing why) which is not common literary property.
—Donald Hall,
The Poet’s Notebook: Excerpts form Notebooks of Contemporary American Poets
(W.W. Norton, 1995), edited by Stephen Kuusisto, Deborah Tall and David Weiss.
Labels:
divorce,
donald hall,
jack gilbert,
plain,
simple,
symbol,
waking,
walt whitman
2.27.2017
in the public square
A symbol monger. An image grinder. A diction trader. A rhetoric freak. A sound dog.
10.01.2016
to suggest is the dream
To name an object is to suppress three-quarters of the enjoyment of a poem, which derives from the pleasure of step-by-step discovery; to suggest, that is the dream. It is the perfect use of this mystery that constitutes the symbol: to evoke an object little by little, so as to bring to light a state of the soul or, inversely, to choose an object and bring out of it a state of the soul through a series of unravelings.
—Stéphane Mallarmé, quoted by Jules Huret, in “Enquête sur l'Evolution littéraire,” Symbolist Art Theories: A Critical Anthology (U. of California Press, 1995), translated by Henri Dorra.
—Stéphane Mallarmé, quoted by Jules Huret, in “Enquête sur l'Evolution littéraire,” Symbolist Art Theories: A Critical Anthology (U. of California Press, 1995), translated by Henri Dorra.
6.19.2016
11.23.2015
idea of a bird
The very idea of a bird is a symbol and a suggestion to the poet. A bird seems to be at the top of the scale, so vehement and intense his life,—large-brained, large-lunged, hot, ecstatic, his frame charged with buoyancy and his heart with song. The beautiful vagabonds, endowed with every grace, masters of all climes, and knowing no bounds,—how many human aspirations are realized in their free, holiday-lives, and how many suggestions to the poet in their flight and song!
—John Burroughs, The Writings of John Burroughs: Birds and poets, with other papers (Houghton, Mifflin and Co., 1904)
—John Burroughs, The Writings of John Burroughs: Birds and poets, with other papers (Houghton, Mifflin and Co., 1904)
6.03.2014
1.30.2013
symbol overwhelmed
The symbol succumbed to the image after the advent of mass media. The bear in the dog pit, the symbol was overwhelmed by the many images springing forth from photo journalism, motion pictures, television,...
4.22.2012
6.30.2008
in praise of vague
The Italian poet Leopardi believed vagueness was an essential characteristic of poetry, allowing the mind "to wander in the realm of the vague and indeterminate, in the realm of those childlike ideas which are born out of the ignorance of the whole."
See G. Singh's comprehensive study of Leopardi and the Theory of Poetry:"It is because the poet is attracted to the vague and indefinite, more than what is clear, concrete, and precise, that his language, even when it does not contain a full-fledged image or simile or metaphor, does to a certain extent partake of the character of an image or a symbol, both saying and suggesting something much more than what it commonly would outside of poetry." (Singh)
See G. Singh's comprehensive study of Leopardi and the Theory of Poetry:"It is because the poet is attracted to the vague and indefinite, more than what is clear, concrete, and precise, that his language, even when it does not contain a full-fledged image or simile or metaphor, does to a certain extent partake of the character of an image or a symbol, both saying and suggesting something much more than what it commonly would outside of poetry." (Singh)
Labels:
g. singh,
giacomo leopardi,
image,
indeterminate,
symbol,
vague
8.02.2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)