Showing posts with label typography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label typography. Show all posts

6.18.2022

annoying innovation

The poet was doing something innovative with typography—it was annoying to read.

11.06.2018

page eater

A codex book uneasily digested by a digital device.

10.10.2017

clean copy

The editor delivered the bad news: The proofreader had no questions about the text.

11.12.2014

type parameter

Bad typography can damage the text, but good/fancy typography cannot appreciably improve it.

2.17.2009

free as in free of

Free verse poetics is based on the immediacy and robust resources of prose itself. By eschewing both traditional/formalist artifices (regular meter and/or rime scheme) and the typographically disjointed arrays of projective verse, free verse avoids the verbal distraction of excessive mediation and visual display.

2.08.2009

typographical f/x

All that typographical f/x without an engaging text.

8.17.2007

blimp titles

I detest seeing titles set in 14 point type (or larger), bolded or emboldened, proclaiming their aggrandized status apart from the body of the poem. Titles big as blimps flying over the tiny text scurrying below, blocking out the reader’s light.