Showing posts with label closure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label closure. Show all posts

10.26.2015

could end anywhere

Once the poem has established itself, any late line can be a last line.

1.23.2015

a door and a window

My sense of the poem is rather classic. I think of a beginning, a middle and an end. I don't believe in open form. A poem may be open, but then it doesn't have form. Merely to stop a poem is not to end it. I don't want to suggest that I believe in neat little resolutions. To put a logical cap on a poem is to suffocate its original impulse. Just as the truly great piece of architecture moves beyond itself into its environment, into the landscape and the sky, so the kind of poetic closure that interests me bleeds out of its ending into the whole universe of feeling and thought. I like an ending that's both a door and a window.

—Stanley Kunitz, "The Art of Poetry No. 29," an interview by Chris Busa, The Paris Review (Spring 1982, No. 83)

10.27.2014

defiant end

When a poem defies an ending it’s perhaps finished.

4.18.2014

sense of an ending

Should the poem end with ‘thus…’, or with ‘and yet…’?

11.22.2013

chute to the unknown

He tended to end a poem with a line that was like pulling the lever to a trapdoor.

11.18.2013

end this mess

It wasn’t that the poem was looking for an epiphany; it was looking for any kind of ending that would make sense of what came before.

5.14.2012

perfunctory panache

Like someone exiting, swinging a cape about his shoulders, the poet ended his poem with one of those large rhetorical flourishes.

11.11.2007

lack of closure

Lack of closure is only an alternate strategy of closure, because poems, after all, finally, do end...