I once asked Irish poet Eavan Boland whether Patrick Kavanagh, the unconventional Irish peasant poet, had helped her as a woman writer in a tradition pretty much devoid of women. She answered in terms similar to mine. Kavanagh had been a crucial guide, she said, because of “his fierce attachment to the devalued parts of his experience and a sense of the meaning of that devaluation within a society.” Kavanagh made poetry of hay and potatoes; in a sense he gave her “permission” to make poetry of the life inside kitchens and backyards.
Deborah Tall, Where We Stand: Women Poets on Literary Tradition (W.W. Norton & Co., 1993), edited and with introduction by Sharon Bryan
Showing posts with label women poets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label women poets. Show all posts
4.16.2018
7.26.2016
woman nomination night
Coming of age as a poet in the late 1950s and well into the '60s, I was not unconscious of the disdain with which aspiring women poets—and people of color—were treated. Gradually I came to realize how arduous the road to acceptance as a woman artist would be. Attitudes changed at a glacial pace. I have cited elsewhere, more than once, an event that took place in 1967. At a dinner hosted by the Poetry Society of America, Robert Lowell rose to praise Marianne Moore as the nation's best woman poet. Blessedly, Langston Hughes leapt up to assert that she was the best Negro woman poet in the country. What astonishes me is how few women today, hearing this story, appreciate the irony in it. Was she black? they ask.
—Maxine Kumin, “Metamorphosis: From Light Verse to the Poetry of Witness” (The Georgia Review, Winter 2012)
—Maxine Kumin, “Metamorphosis: From Light Verse to the Poetry of Witness” (The Georgia Review, Winter 2012)
7.20.2015
speak up
The only danger to poetry is the reticence and silence of poets.
—Eavan Boland, "Letter to a Young Woman Poet," American Poetry Review (May/June 1997).
—Eavan Boland, "Letter to a Young Woman Poet," American Poetry Review (May/June 1997).
Labels:
danger,
eavan boland,
reticence,
silence,
what's poetry for,
women poets
11.04.2014
gender gerrymandering
Remember that time you picked up an anthology and three-quarters of the poets included were women. No, because it didn’t happen. It’s either a 100% women, as in a specifically woman-centric antholology, or it’s well under 50% women.
Labels:
anthology,
canon,
genre,
gerrymandering,
women poets,
women's poetry
4.12.2014
accurate and modest
Elizabeth Bishop is spectacular in being unspectacular. Why has no one ever thought of this, one asks oneself; why not be accurate and modest.
—Marianne Moore, in a review of Bishop's North & South (Houghton Mifflin, 1946), The Nation (Sept. 29, 1946).
—Marianne Moore, in a review of Bishop's North & South (Houghton Mifflin, 1946), The Nation (Sept. 29, 1946).
11.17.2010
voice overlord
They called her ‘confessional’ in order to silence her. [Thinking of Plath.]
Labels:
confessional,
silence,
sylvia plath,
voice,
women poets
6.21.2006
stolen or by chance
If what I do prove well, it won't advance.
They'll say it's stolen, or else it was by chance.
—Anne Bradstreet, The Prologue
They'll say it's stolen, or else it was by chance.
—Anne Bradstreet, The Prologue
Labels:
anne bradstreet,
chance,
prove,
stolen,
women poets
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)