Showing posts with label weight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label weight. Show all posts

8.01.2026

lowered by a crane

Each successive stanza fell into place as though lowered by a crane.

9.10.2023

load-bearing line

A line must bear the weight of the one or many above it.

3.02.2022

gross vehicle weight

No line without one weighted word.

1.31.2019

page count: one

A broadside equal to a whole book.

12.23.2017

transcendent particulars

The poet-critic Robyn Sarah, quoting from her own notebook entry, in a piece called “Poetry’s Bottom Line,” stated that she had three things she looked for in a poem. The first, that a poem “should transcend its own particulars,” I had no reason to argue with. But the second and third seemed contradictory, perhaps because of the figurative nature of the statements: “2) it should be built to bear weight” and “3) it should have lift.” These two elements are somewhat at odds in the physical world, though both are admirable qualities for a poem. My mind wanted to find an analog for weight-bearing and lift: Just north of where I live there is an airbase where several Lockheed C-5 Galaxy military transport jets take off and land. They can certainly bear weight (many tons of equipment), and have lift enough to bear that weight aloft, though in flight they appear lumbering. Then I thought of a more apt thing from this world: a cathedral. Certainly, as something built of stone, and often buttressed, the cathedral’s arches bear great weight. And by their height, the arches leading to thinner ribs, holding tall stain-glass windows, under a vaulted dome and great spire(s), all of these aspects create ‘uplift,’ as one raises the head upward to gaze in awe, so that if the experience is not one of actual lift, the feeling of a lifting toward the heavens is there, leading one back to her first notion of ‘transcending its particulars’ of stone, timber and glass.

2.07.2017

flightless bird

So many feathers and sequins, the piece sagged under the weight of its costume.

6.04.2016

measure for measure

Most poems fail based on a simple mixed measurement ratio: the material (subject, idea, story, substance) weighs less than its length in lines.

1.25.2016

slack structure

Lines sag when the words don’t have weight.

10.19.2015

you are here

Using place names: like dropping a section of the earth into the poem.

10.12.2014

sound architecture

One very often finds that in a Moore poem every phrase is load-bearing. This is sound architecture, the weight brilliantly distributed.

—Maureen N. McLane, “My Marianne Moore,” My Poets (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2012)

5.28.2013

gathering floodtide

Some poems start with the force of a wave crashing, while with others we must allow the first few lines to slowly build the momentum of the poem, each passing line gathering the weight of more words taken up in the flow.

6.22.2010

by net or gaff

You’re gonna need a net or gaff to land that last line.

4.24.2008

load-bearing wall

Think of each line as a load-bearing wall: If the wrong one is broken through during revision, the whole structure of the poem collapses.

10.01.2007

stratum

Each line is a stratum. As you read down through the poem, the weight of the lines above you can be felt.

6.07.2007

content over concept

A poem of concept is generally lesser in weight than a poem of content.

4.11.2007

anchor word

Look for an anchor word in each line of the poem. If a line lacks a word of significant weight, then that line is not advancing the poem.